The Age of Demons and You

Everyone in Eberron knows the story of the Progenitor Wyrms. There are a few who believe that these beings were literal dragons who ruled over a civilization we can’t even imagine… that they turned on one another and destroyed all traces of that world in their feud. But the common myth — shared in various forms by almost every culture — paints things in more mythical and metaphorical light. Here’s one version.

The Progenitor Wyrms breathed creation into the void. Siberys breathed fire and kindled the endless flames of Fernia. Khyber’s icy breath formed the frozen depths of Risia. They had new ideas and worked together to give those form. Siberys envisioned a realm of peace, and together they shaped the serene towers of Syrania. Khyber demanded an endless war, and so Shavarath was born. Eventually they made a place where all of these creations could convergence — a realm where there was both life and death, war and peace, darkness and light. And it was in this place that Khyber turned on the others, tearing Siberys to pieces. Eberron grappled with Khyber. She couldn’t defeat her sister, but she caught Khyber in her coils, wrapping around her. Eberron transformed herself into a living prison, becoming the world itself, forever trapping Khyber within the world. Dying Siberys coiled around Eberron, and so it remains today: The Dragon Above, The Dragon Below, and The Dragon Between.

Life was the only prison that could hold Khyber, and so Eberron gave birth to the natural world. The blood of Siberys fell from the sky. Some drops quickened as they fell and became the celestial couatl. Others touched Eberron, and from this union the dragons were formed. Where blood struck ice, a white dragon emerged; where it touched a swamp, a black dragon was born. Thus the dragons are the mightiest creatures of the natural world, imbued with the magic of Siberys and yet still born of Eberron and thus mortal.

Khyber could not escape her prison, but her fury spawned horrors both endless and mortal. The host of fiends rose from the depths and laid claim to Eberron, twisting the natural world and tormenting its creatures. Terror ruled for an unimaginable time. This was the First Age of the world… the Age of Demons.

As I said, this is one version of the Progenitor myth. In some versions, the Progenitors begin as siblings working in harmony. In others, they were always rivals seeking to outdo one another with acts of creation. Some say that the entire act of creation was driven by their pursuit of the Prophecy… and that Khyber killed Siberys in an attempt to harness this power. As a game master it’s up to you to decide if any element of this is true. Did three mighty beings create reality? Were they literally dragons, or unimaginable beings of untold power? Or is this all just a way to explain the world, the ring in the sky, and the darkness below where horrors are born?

Whatever the origin of the world, we haven’t talked much about the Age of Demons. But the legacy of the First Age still haunts the present day. Fiends and dragons spar in the shadows, and the threat of the Overlords is an eternal threat, held at bay by the light of the Silver Flame. But what was the world like in those days, and what would a return of the Overlords actually mean?

About The Overlords…

I’ve covered some of these topics in the past. This post is an extended discussion of the Overlords of the First Age, including a list of known Overlords, the nature of their bonds, and what they might do if released. This post discusses the Demon Wastes and the nature of demonic ruins. Here’s a quick summary of things you should know.

  • The Overlords are immortal fiends with godlike power (equivalent to divine rank 7 in 3.5 terms). At full power, an Overlord exerts influence over a broad region, but this dominion is finite; it might cover a country, but not an entire continent. There were approximately thirty Overlords, and between them they dominated the world. While they have the equivalent of Divine Rank and while I may refer to them as “gods” in this article, they ARE NOT ACTUALLY DEITIES. They cannot grant divine magic, though a devout follower might be able to draw power directly from Khyber as a result of their faith. 
  • The Overlords cannot be permanently destroyed. The couatl sacrificed themselves and fused their celestial energy together to create the Silver Flame, a force capable of binding the Overlords and most of their minions.
  • While most of the fiendish forces were bound with their masters, some slipped through. These beings largely work to release their masters, and they are called The Lords of Dust. They are opposed by the dragons of The Chamber.
  • Each Overlord is bound in a physical vessel, but it is the power of the Silver Flame that keeps them bound. They can only be released if a particular piece of the Draconic Prophecy comes to pass. The Draconic Prophecy is constantly evolving, and so the Chamber and the Lords of Dust study it and seek to manipulate it to achieve their goals.
  • Even while bound, the Overlords still influence the regions around their prisons. Most Overlords are effectively asleep, and this influence is essentially an effect of their dreams. A few — such as Bel Shalor, the Shadow in the Flame — are aware and actively scheming.
  • “Demon” usually refers to a chaotic evil fiend, but it can also be used as a general term for any evil immortal, and this is its context of “The Age of Demons.”

An Age of Demons

The Overlords dominated Eberron for millions of years. They didn’t choose to rule. There wasn’t any sort of organized civilization as we would recognize it. The Overlords didn’t form a government or establish countries. Rather, they shaped reality within their dominions to reflect their nature. The Heart of Winter embodies the killing cold, and bitter ice engulfs any land where she resides. The Rage of War thrives on strife and conflict, and armies clash in his wake. Katashka the Gatekeeper sets the dead against the living. Where the Overlords raised cities, it was because the city was somehow a part of this identity. Rak Tulkhesh might create a fortress simply so it could be besieged. The dark metropolis of Eldrantulku was home to clans and guilds whose endless intrigues reflected their master’s love of betrayal and discord. Mortals caught in the sphere of an Overlord would be swept into these things and forced to play a part in them. But these things didn’t build towards anything. The fortress of Rak Tulkhesh would be forgotten once his attention shifted, replaced with some new battle. We sometimes say that the Overlords had mortal slaves, but this implies an institution of slavery; it’s more accurate to say that all mortals were helpless playthings caught in the dreams of cruel gods.

The Overlords weren’t allies and had no interest in cooperation. When the domains of two overlords overlapped they would clash, and many took great joy in these conflicts. But mortals remained helpless pawns.

We have no records of precisely what creatures existed at that time or how they came to be. The Ghaash’kala orcs and lizardfolk of Q’barra seem to have traditions that can be traced back. Some believe that means these races were widespread. Some say that the orcs were created by demons, that Rak Tulkhesh imbued hobgoblins with his rage and that the Silver Flame redeemed them. The human and demihuman civilizations covered in canon didn’t come into existence for many tens of thousands of years. The dragons were first; then the giants; then the elves and goblins and dwarves. As a DM, feel free to explore this however you see fit. If you wish to add an ancient human civilization that rose and fell while the giants still ruled Xen’drik, go ahead.

The couatl helped mortals resist the influence of the Overlords, and it was this that ultimately allowed a resistance to form — primarily the dragons (themselves imbued with some of the essence of Siberys), but also other mortal species. The Overlords are immortal, and there seemed to be no way to achieve a true victory… until the Prophecy revealed the way that the Overlords could be bound. This led to the couatl sacrifice and the kindling of the Silver Flame. While the Couatl formed the Flame, just as with Tira and Bel Shalor, it took mortal heroes to complete the binding; this is where Ourelonastrix, Dularrahnak and other champions played a crucial role. The Overlords and most of their minions were bound; their works collapsed; and the normal course of history began.

What Does This Mean?

First of all, understanding the nature of the Age of Demons helps understand why the Lords of Dust don’t just take over Khorvaire. They don’t want to rule this pathetic, mundane world. They want to return to a time when their gods walked the world and reality bent to their will. Bear in mind that the Lords of Dust are immortal beings who may have been around for a million years. They aren’t human, and their motives and the way they experience time are unlike those of mortal creatures. They, too, are incarnate ideas. They are for the most part aspects of their master’s domain, and pursuing the release of their master is a natural thing. To be sure, there are a few of the Lords of Dust who want to supplant their Overlords and steal their power… but that sort of behavior would be most common in a servant of someone like Eldrantulku or even Bel Shalor, both of whom embody corruption and betrayal.

It also shows why the Lords of Dust aren’t close allies. The Overlords fought one another more often than not. The Bleak Council of Ashtakala was established to prevent the Lords of Dust from interfering with one another accidentally, and to allow sharing of resources when it is useful. But the key word there is accidentally. The circumstances that will release one Overlord might actively block the release of another; even failing this, two rakshasa might pursue a personal vendetta that goes back long before human civilization.  This post talks more about the Council of Ashtakala, the binding, and the relationships between Overlords.

The Nature of the Binding

The spirit of each Overlord is contained in some sort of vessel. However, it is the Silver Flame that binds the spirit to the vessel. The only way to release an Overlord is to follow a particular path of the Draconic Prophecy. The Lords of Dust seek to drive the world down these paths, while the dragons of the Chamber work to identify and negate Prophetic paths that could release an Overlord. Prophetic paths are very specific; it’s not simply Queen Aurala must die — something a rakshasa could easily do on its own — it’s that The seventh son of the Great Kraken must slay an innocent queen with the Blade of Sorrows, in the belief that doing so will save the world. The rakshasa can’t do this alone. But to make it happen, they need to make sure the following things happen…

  • Aurala becomes Queen.
  • Someone becomes “The Great Kraken” (probably a Lyrandar heir) and has seven sons.
  • That seventh son acquires the Blade of Sorrows.
  • The seventh son is convinced that killing Aurala will save the world, and successfully carries out this assassination.

In setting this up, the Lords of Dust also want to use a light enough touch that they aren’t noticed by the Chamber. The key point here is that a rakshasa may end up helping player characters. They want this Lyrandar heir to become a champion who would try to save the world, and they want him to acquire the mighty Blade of Sorrows. So for a time, the rakshasa would actually be acting as a patron for the group.

Of course, there’s two forces that might interfere: the Chamber and other Lords of Dust. As I mentioned before, the circumstances that release one Overlord might block another; while killing Aurala might release Sul Khatesh, it could be that Tul Oreshka needs Aurala to marry the Seventh Son of the Great Kraken and to have a child who will then be sacrificed. Meanwhile, if dragons of the Chamber identify this particular thread, they will try to find a way to block it… which could range from keeping the Great Kraken from having children, hiding the Blade of Sorrows, or simply killing the Seventh Son. This all ties to the fluid nature of the Prophecy. There are so many possible threads that the Chamber doesn’t know them all — and any time an equation is altered, the Prophecy shifts to account for it. There will ALWAYS be a Prophetic path to release Sul Khatesh. If the Chamber kills the Seventh Son of the Great Kraken, a new path to release will be established… but it will take time for her prakhutu to discover the new path, and it could be decades or centuries before that path can be fulfilled.

So the point here is that the path to releasing an Overlord is generally something that will have been in motion for a long time, and if it connects to player characters, it may involve a series of events: gaining power, killing an enemy, acquiring an artifact, falling in love, etc, etc. If you want quick action, choose a path that can be resolved quickly. If you want things to be more dramatic, let PCs discover that they have a long-term role that has yet to play out. Say two PCs become romantically involved. What happens if they learn that their (as yet unconceived) child is destined to release Rak Tulkhesh?

All of this ties to the idea that the Dragon-Fiend conflict is a long term cold war. It involves the most epic threats to the world… but it’s something that can’t be rushed by demon or dragon, and a struggle that plays out over the course of decades and centuries.

The Fraying of Bonds

RELEASING an Overlord requires the completion of a Prophetic Path. However, there’s a range of options between absolute release and total imprisonment, and this is where Overlords like Rak Tulkhesh and Bel Shalor live.

When the Overlords were first bound, they were in absolute torpor, unaware of their surroundings and influencing the world only incidentally. But each Overlord embodies an idea. when people within a certain vicinity of the Overlord’s prison embody that idea, it strengthens the Overlord. As the Overlord gains strength, it becomes more aware and more able to actively influence events. If this goes far enough, you can even posit a partial release — the Overlord might not be able to exercise its full power, or to venture far from its prison, but it could manifest a physical form and cover a larger radius with its effect. This is what happened with Bel Shalor, who obtained a partial release and exerted influence over Thrane for a year before being rebound by the sacrifice of Tira Miron in what is now Flamekeep. You could even present a story where partially releasing an Overlord and rebinding it is desirable, because its bonds have frayed severely and rebinding it is the only way to strengthen them.

While Bel Shalor remains bound an unable to physically manifest, he has a stronger connection to the Silver Flame and is able to tempt anyone who heres the Voice of the Flame. He doesn’t have actual coercive power (…yet…) but if people fall prey to temptation, that gives him strength and frays his bonds. Likewise, it’s been suggested that Rak Tulkhesh has vessels spread across Khorvaire and that his agents are actively aggession and hatred to strengthen their master. And of course, you could decide that this kind of fraying is all that is required to achieve a partial release, or that this is tied to the Prophetic condition of the bonds. If Rak Tulkhesh requires a specific sort of war to be released, the stronger his influence, the more chance he can help to trigger that war.

Beyond this: what about those vessels? I’ve already said that shattering a vessel doesn’t release the Overlord… it just spreads their influence. So… is that a GOOD thing? Is there any negative to the Overlord? Yes, certainly. The smaller the vessel, the more restricted its influence is in range and effect. An overlord with a singular prison might be bound to a Khyber shard the size of a small whale. This might have a powerful effect across a radius of miles and absolutely overwhelm weak-minded people in its immediate vicinity. By contrast, a shard of Rak Tulkhesh embedded in the hilt of a sword might empower and influence its wielder, and might have a minor effect in their vicinity (encouraging aggression in a 120 radius, say), but it’s not the same. On the other hand, it lets the Rage of War draw strength from a wider area. So breaking up a vessel sacrifices concentrated power for a wider net. If an an Overlord is truly released, its essence will be drawn from all its shards. So it’s not a requirement for its agents to reassemble a shattered prison; if it was, ALL prisons would have been shattered and scattered.

Other Ways To Use This

Obviously the endgame of plots involving the Lords of Dust can generally involve an Overlord. But what else can you do with the Lords of Dust or Overlords that doesn’t involve that epic conflict? Here’s a few points.

Trouble with Vessels. The vessels of the Overlords take many forms. Khyber crystals are common… and if those crystals are shattered, every shard has a link to the Overlord. So you could have a static, immovable prison that influences the region around it. You could have a shard of an Overlord’s vessel embedded into an object — creating a powerful (and potentially useful) item, but one that spreads the Overlord’s influence. A sword bearing a shard of Rak Tulkhesh would surely be powerful in battle… but it might cause conflict to break out in its vicinity, or drive the bearer into a rage. With either static or mobile vessels, you might also say that the influence is amplified under certain circumstances. The effects of Katashka’s vessel might be amplified when Mabar is coterminous, and the sword of Rak Tulkhesh could grow stronger with every battle in which it is used. Consider the ideas of “The Fraying of Bonds”, above. 

A Piece of a Puzzle. Releasing an Overlord is a long term project. PCs could be caught up in an early stage action — rakshasas or their agents seeking to steal an artifact, assassinate someone, manipulate someone. Success or failure won’t obviously alter the fate of the world, because it’s so far down the road… but it gives an immediate action to deal with.

Ancient Feuds. PCs could be caught up in conflict between servants of different Overlords, or even manipulated by one fiend into fighting another.

Spreading Influence. When Lords of Dust aren’t specifically working to release their masters, they may seek to strengthen the Overlord by encouraging the behavior tied to their sphere. Mordakhesh, the speaker of the Rage of War, encourages conflict across Khorvaire. Hektula might (in disguise) spread arcane knowledge — whether aiding an enemy cult or mentoring a player character — because the discovery of arcane secrets forges a bond with Sul Khatesh. Again, this doesn’t enable the RELEASE of the Overlord, but it increases their awareness and ability to affect the world from within their prison.

Active Agents. Setting the Lords of Dust aside, you can have mortals working directly with the Overlords. A barbarian berserker’s rage could come from a bond to Rak Tulkhesh; the fiend grants them great power, but will they some day demand a price? Likewise, Overlords are great patrons for warlocks, and you can find an Overlord for almost any pact. It could be that the Overlord begins with requests that seem harmless — for example, asking the warlock to battle the agents of other Overlords, so hey, they’re just fighting bad guys, right? Or perhaps the warlock believes that THEIR Overlord is actually just misunderstood; Sul Khatesh just wants to share knowledge the Silver Flame seeks to keep from humanity! You can certainly have a story where the longer it goes, the more questionable the requests get… or you could decide that while the Overlord is EVIL, their power can be used to achieve good things. The main thing here is to make sure the player is on board with the direction you’re going in.

Another option is to say that the power of the PC is drawn from the Overlord, meaning that the PC is actively weakening the Overlord by using that power — so the warlock isn’t doing the bidding of the Overlord, they are actually working against them and using their own power to do it. This is back to the Fraying of Bonds. Such a warlock isn’t significantly weakening the full immortal power of the Overlord, they are simply limiting its ability to perceive and influence the world. 

Agents of Darkness

A quick point, but an important one. It may be that you just don’t like rakshasa. That’s fine. Rakshasa are the most common native fiends, and they are well suited to subtle manipulation. But as noted in this article, any sort of fiend can serve an Overlord. And as noted above, you can likewise have mortal agents who are in some way empowered by an Overlord — with or without any sort of connection to the Lords of Dust. Some Overlords are called out as NOT associating with rakshasa; Tiamat and Dral Khatuur are two such fiends.

Good vs Evil

One question has come up a few times, essentially: why are the forces of evil stronger than the forces of good? Why aren’t there benevolent equivalents of the Overlords? If the rakshasa can’t be killed, how come the Couatl were sacrificed?

There’s two basic answers to this — one ground in mythology, and one based on game design.

Mythologically, consider the most basic lesson of the Progenitors. Khyber (immortal evil) treacherously defeated Siberys (immortal good). Eberron (mortal life) contains Khyber and holds it at bay. Siberys is dead, but his gifts — magic — empower the children of Eberron to fight the children of Khyber. The Silver Flame reflects this same metaphor: The couatl sacrificed themselves to create the Silver Flame, and now they can’t fight evil themselves — but through the Silver Flame empowers mortals to fight evil. Eberron is founded on the principle that evil used treachery to gain a strong position, but that mortals can triumph over it.

From a game design standpoint, one of the fundamental principles of Eberron is that it is a world in need of heroes. If everything is in balance — if the forces of good were as strong or stronger than the forces of evil — then heroes wouldn’t be as vital. If a rashasa is doing something evil, a couatl isn’t going to just show up and smite it, because that doesn’t involve YOU. Instead, the Voice of the Flame will give you a vision of the threat and the spirit of a couatl will empower you through divine channeling… but YOU are still the critical component.

So the short form is that we WANTED evil to be stronger than good, because that’s why the world needs YOU. There’s no all-powerful force of good that can solve the problem without you. With that said, the couatl weren’t destroyed. They sacrificed their existence as individuals in order to create a gestalt force of immortal energy with the power to bind ALL THE OVERLORDS. It’s simply that they can’t exercise that power on their own; they need mortals to be their champions. But that force for good is there. Anything that the Overlords can do can be undone by mortal heroes. There’s always hope; it’s just that there’s never an ABSOLUTE victory. There will always be threats for the heroes of the next generation to deal with.

Random Questions

Here’s a few questions that touch on this subject. If you have questions, ask in the comments!

Do the big bads of other settings have a place in eberron? Tiamat, jubilex, demogorgon…

Certainly. If the entity in question has godlike power, the logical approach is to recast it as an Overlord, and this is exactly what was done with Tiamat; see Dragons of Eberron for more information. If the entity is powerful but not THAT powerful — such as Demogorgon — there’s a few options. One is to place them in one of the outer planes, if there’s a good match. Another is to make them lieutenants of an Overlord, because remember, it’s not ALL about rakshasa. Orcus could be the prakutu of Katashka, if that fit your vision of him. The third option is what I suggested for Demogorgon when I converted the Savage Tide adventure path: to make the demon prince ruler of a realm within Khyber itself. As I talk about in this post, my vision is that Khyber is filled with demiplanes, which larger fill the role of layers of the Abyss. So Demogorgon could rule a realm within Khyber. Throughout most of history, he has simply dwelled within his realm — perhaps held in check by the Ghaash’kala or other agents of the Silver Flame. Now something has changed and he is reaching out to affect the mortal world.

Are there any Overlords imprisoned on Sarlona? Any ancient wielders of the Silver Flame (the human equivalent of the Ghaashkala?) Or do the Inspired maintain the barriers themselves?

Yes, there are Overlords in Sarlona. Secrets of Sarlona says  “Scholars sifting the legends of the Age of Fiends believe that three rakshasa rajahs are bound in Sarlona—one within the heart of Korrandar in Adar, one beneath the yuan-ti ruins of Syrkarn, and a third in the Krertok Peninsula of the Tundra.” The ancient human kingdom of Khalesh is presented as having had a bond to the Silver Flame and the Shulassakar; Khalesh fell during the Sundering, but a secret order of adepts might survive. But the Adarans act to contain the fiend in Korrandar, and the Inspired have an elite order known as The Edgewalkers who are trained to deal with this sort of thing.

Are denizens of other planes aware of the Overlords? What effect might a freed Overlord’s influence have on manifest zones, can effects of its dominion bleed through to other planes?

This answer goes both ways. Every plane has powerful entities that could match an Overlord. But these spirits are bound to their planes just as the Overlords are bound to Eberron. A manifest zone would be a beachhead that could give such a bring influence in another plane, but by default, the native powers of the plane will trump interlopers. On Eberron, Tul Oreshka has more power than il-Lashtavar; if Tul Oreshka extended herself into Dal Quor, the Dreaming Dark would put her in her place.

But that’s the default, and as always, the real question here is “What’s the story you want to tell?”

What could be some other ways that the Bleak Council can use the Draconic Prophecy against the Dragons (and all of Eberron as well) ?

The Draconic Prophecy is a series of complex If-Then statements. If (X) happens, (Y) will happen. It can predict the release of an Overlord, the death of an individual, a natural disaster, the rise of a cult, or anything else. If X happens, a massive volcano will detonate in the heart of Argonnessen. If X happens, manifest zones to Syrania will be cut off and the towers of Sharn will collapse. If X happens, an avatar of Tiamat will cause a civil war among the dragons. Generally these are all things that could happen. It’s not that doing the thing suddenly makes a volcano appear in Argonnessen; there’s a dormant volcano already there, and it COULD suddenly become active, but if this path is enacted it WILL happen. You are taking a possible path of the future and locking it in.

Is there any motives other then breaking free that a overlord could have? More concretely, how could a non-evil warlock constructively work with a patron that was revealed to be a overlord (at first seemed to be a elven tairndal ancestor)?

This is covered by my point above. They could be interested in something that will help them break free… in two centuries. Is the PC warlock concerned about helping start a path that won’t be resolved for generations? The could be interested in any sort of action that is logically within their sphere, because this theoretically strengthens them. Or for the simple answer, they could want the PC to fight the agents of other Overlords, enacting some old grudge.

Can you tell us more about Sakinnirot, the Scar that Abides? Any advice on how you can show Sakinnirot’s influence in and around Stormreach?

According to page 157 of City of Stormreach, the Scar That Abides is “patron to all those who plot bloody revenge, reveling in the gratification of a grudge satisfied. Its following is the cult of an injury savored, and wounds of both a physical and spiritual nature are left to fester in its name.” That same page calls out that Sakinnirot enjoys conflict between the Dragonmarked Houses, especially if that conflict ends in violence or ruin. Sakinnirot’s domains are Passion and Destruction.

Sakinnirot is clearly a cousin to Eldrantulku and Bel Shalor, who also specialize in sowing discord. But each are still distinct. Bel Shalor focuses on drawing good people to evil action. Eldrantulku specializes in pure strife and chaos. Sakinnirot is about lingering hate and resentment that builds to destruction… the infection that remains hidden until it is far too late to be cured. So the first and simplest way to reflect Sakinnirot’s influence is an increase in violent vendettas and feuds. This begins with people taking bitter offense at any possible slight, and nursing that hatred until it bursts into a violent flame. This can start small — an increase in murders, an innkeeper poisoning customers because they don’t appreciate her hard work — but it could build to dramatic tensions that threaten the city. Consider a Romeo & Juliet scenario where members of two Dragonmarked houses fall in love, resulting in the death both of the lovers and a few other members of the houses. This leads to further retaliatory measures and murders, which escalates to open, violent conflict between members of those houses, along with demands on other local houses and powers to take sides. It seems ridiculous to throw the city into chaos over such a thing — yet neither side will relinquish their burning hatred for the other. This is one example, but you could likewise see bitter rivalries between the Coin Lords and their followers, or open violence between followers of different religions. We’re back to the convergence of Passion and Destruction… the city becoming a haven for hate in all its forms, passion that leads to destruction.

Should Sakinnirot’s power grow, you could also play up the physical aspect of lingering wounds that won’t heal. Healing magics could begin to falter, initially healing for only half the usual amount… and if the effect continues, possibly failing altogether.

If one was to try to stat out The Scar that Abides, what would you theme his abilities around?

Follow up on the ideas suggested above. Wounds that won’t heal. The ability to amplify existing tensions… if I can identify a grievance between two people, I can use a suggestion effect to amplify this and force them to turn on one another. You can also play up the idea of bloody revenge, saying that Sakinnirot can return any injury done to him with even greater effect. And, of course, you can use the abilities of the Passion and Destruction domains as inspiration. Beyond that, like any Overlord, he’s a being of immense raw power.

In Eberron what is the difference between a Devil, Demon, and Yugoloth?

In many settings these beings are affiliated with a particular plane. In Eberron these classifications are much like “Elf” or “Dwarf” — they inform you about the basic nature of the fiend, but not its CULTURE… which is defined by its plane of origin. As a general rule, demons embody concepts of chaos and evil; devils concepts of law and evil; and yugoloths, just evil. This is discussed further in this post — in short, a devil from Shavarath is above the organized and evil implementation of WAR, while one from Fernia is about FIRE, and one from Khyber might just be about corruption and strife. In Shavarath, you have an endless bitter struggle between devils, demons, archons and more — but the devils of Shavarath don’t care about the demons of Fernia.

How would you Imagine an Eberron Campaign themed around thwarting the LOD to play out, how would you start it off and what direction/ story elements would you introduce to make for an exciting long term campaign?

Laying out an entire campaign arc is the sort of thing I’d want to devote an entire article to. There’s no one simple option. Are you focusing on pulp or noir? Are your players big damn heroes? Are they researchers who dig too deeply? This ties to the fact that the choice of Overlord would have an ENORMOUS effect on the flavor of the campaign. If I choose Rak Tulkhesh as my big bad, then I might have the players be former soldiers and have the campaign focus on their dealing with the scars of the Last War and the tensions that are driving towards a second war. Whereas if my Overlord is Sul Khatesh I’d want a strongly arcane part dealing with new arcane revelations. And if the Overlord is Katashka, I might do something more straightforward like the Age of Worms or a zombie apocalypse. I don’t have time to go into all these sort of options in depth. But the point is to start by choosing your Overlord and to consider: What are the actions that help her followers fray her bonds? What are the visible effects of her greater influence and awareness? What is the nature of her vessel? If it’s singular, where is it? If it’s split, how might the players encounter a fragment of it? If she could be released, what are the Prophetic conditions of her release? 

That last one is a big deal, because it’s something that the players should be driven towards and it’s something they would have to slowly piece together… even if they can’t stop it, the slow revelation of it would be an important part of the campaign. You’d never want to say “Surprise! You released an Overlord!” You’d want to say “Remember how that mysterious old man helped you get the Blade of Sorrows? How you all thought that was a little weird? Now you know why.”

So: I’d want to figure out the Overlord. I’d want to decide how their growing influence would be reflected in the campaign. I’d want to come up with the Prophetic seal and figure out how meeting that condition would be spread across the campaign. I’d want to come up with a “seasonal arc” that the characters are going to deal with at low levels — the Overlord and their Prakhutu may be the big bads, but what’s a compelling storyline — that may or may not have any connection — to start things off? So maybe the early bad guy is going to be ann Aurum greedhead who’s collecting Khyber shards. Eventually it will become an issue that’s he’s stupidly been bringing together shards tied to a particular Overlord. But initially he’s just a low-level bad guy who might start off hiring us to get shards, and who we can then clash with once we discover he’s bad, and that gets us a little ways and a little power before we start to realize there are greater powers at work.

That’s as much as I have time for now, but hopefully you get the idea.

I feel that there are two kind of Overlords: the ones that involve “moral corruption” and the ones that involve physical threats like killing cold. Do you agree that the first one are more interesting for a campaign? How is an Overlord of cold campaign different from one involving the plain of cold? 

There’s a number of different things to unpack here. First: I agree that the more subtle Overlords are generally more interesting for a campaign… but not every Overlord has to be part of a campaign. Dral Khatuur was created for use with a backdrop in the Frostfell, and was intended to justify the powerful magic and supernatural threats that explorers encountered in that place. She wasn’t intended to drive a campaign; she was intended to drive a short, horrific story arc. Thus it helps for the threat she poses to BE more concrete and obvious, because the players don’t have time to be drawn into a larger and more complex storyline. Tied to this, Dral Khatuur is called out as not having a faction among the Lords of Dust. She’s an Overlord, but she serves a different sort of story purpose. Her story included the possibility that if freed, she would reach out to strike Khorvaire or other lands, but that wasn’t the primary context in which she was presented. This same principle holds true of other Overlords. Tul Oreshka, the Voice in the Darkness, is an Overlord I’d be more likely to use as part of a short arc dealing with madness and revelation than as the big bad of an entire campaign. Katashka the Gatekeeper could be the main arc of an entire campaign, but I’d make that campaign about the dead rising to prey on the living, a blend of zombie apocalypse and ghost-story horror… and it would again be far more obvious and physically dangerous than the subtle machinations of Bel Shalor. And yet, that could be a tremendously compelling campaign if the players were in the mood for it.

How is an overlord of cold different from an elemental? And if all it wants is freezing and killing, how does he shows his immense intelligence?

Dral Khatuur isn’t an embodiment of the natural concept of cold. She embodies mortal fear of the cold and the darkness. She is the winter that steals the sun, the terror you feel when you hear the icy wind howling in the night. She can trap the spirits of those she kills; if that icy wind sounds like screaming, it may be the tortured cries of Dral Khatuur’s victims. She can even craft simulacrums of her victims out of frost, and send them back to prey on their friends… so if a comrade of yours disappears for a time in the icy dark and then returns, are you sure that it’s still your friend? In short it’s the same as a lycanthrope; it resembles a natural phenomenon, but it is embodying mortal fears as opposed to an actual, natural concept. This comes back to the fact that Dral Khatuur was designed to drive a suspense/horror story arc as opposed to a long term campaign.

How much is the undying court aware of the Overlords? What do the various groups in Eberron know about this story? I assume the general populace of Khorvaire knows often warped mythology, but do the sages of Arxanix know what rests underneath their island-towers? Does the Library of Korranberg have records on the Age of Demons? What do Phiarlan, Thuranni, and to a lesser extent, Medani know about this? What has the Silver Flame pieced together? Does Dariznu, for instance, know that a shard of Rak Tulkhesh’s essence lies below Thaliost? Do the Carrion Tribes know what exactly they worship?

I’ve lumped these all together, because it all ties together. The basic concept of the Overlords is common knowledge. Followers of the Sovereign Host assert that the Sovereigns defeated mighty demons in the dawn of the world; the Church of the Silver Flame is founded on protecting the world from fiends. So the GENERAL story is common knowledge: there were mighty demons, they were defeated and bound, and there are still lesser fiends out in the world seeking to prey on innocents and free their masters.

Now: the specific names and attributes of those fiends? Where they are bound? Much more obscure. It’s not simply that it’s unknown; it’s that accurate information is buried in massive amounts of inaccurate myths and outright lies. Aside from knowledge just being clouded by time, consider that throughout human history you’ve had agents of the Lords of Dust intentionally spreading misinformation. If Korranberg had a tome that was truly a threat to the Lords of Dust, they’d either have it destroyed or discredited. So this is the point of making a skill check. Say you set the difficulty of a check at 25. That doesn’t mean that if you get a 24 you know NOTHING — it means that you know an assortment of conflicting stories, or slightly inaccurate information.

The basic point here: in my Eberron, the cold war between the dragons and the Lords of Dust is the ultimate high level story. The Dreaming Dark and the Daelkyr have been causing trouble for a few thousand years; the Lords of Dust have been here since the dawn of time. They have literally been pulling the strings of history. The only reason they don’t rule the world is because that would be a boring waste of time. In MY Eberron, this is why I’m going to usually have some OTHER villain in the spotlight. You THINK the bad guy is the Aurum, or the Emerald Claw, or even the Dreaming Dark. It’s only as you work through these battles that you may discover that all of your previous actions — heroic though they were — were all leading down a particular path of the Prophecy.

But beyond all of that, in my Eberron it’s important to me to have the players at the heart of things. Does Dariznu know about Rak Tulkhesh’s influence in Thaliost? Well in MY campaign, either he doesn’t and the players may be able to help things by discovering this… or he knows about it and if someone keeping it secret and using it for his own ends, and the PCs may discover THAT. Same goes for Arcanix and Sul Khatesh. Surely it’s not a coincidence that Arcanix was moved to a location within the influence of the Keeper of Secrets. The question is if it was arranged by a human who hopes to gain arcane knowledge… or if one or more of the masters of Arcanix are agents of Ashtakala. So SOMEONE knows, sure… but I’d make it something the PCs need to discover, not anything like common knowledge.

With that said, I might have SOME locations that have been identified by the Church of the Silver Flame over the years. It’s just back to the core question: will it make a better STORY for the knowledge to be known, or is it more interesting for the players to uncover a secret.

As for the Undying Court, they surely know OF the Overlords. But their power — and interest — is limited beyond Aerenal. I’m sure they are very focused on protecting Aerenal from the Lords of Dust — just as they protect it from Argonnessen. But in my Eberron they aren’t actively out in the world fighting the Lords of Dust… because again, that’s the job of the PCs.

Thanks as always to my Patreon supporters, who make this blog possible!

46 thoughts on “The Age of Demons and You

  1. In my Naturalist’s Guide, I’ve cast the various celestials as well as fiends as aspects of a plane; the Archon of Redemption (taken from Planeshift: Zendikar) is a celestial of war and battle, and so it’s a native of Shavarath, like a bearded devil. Can we categorise all “outsiders” to use the 3.5 term by their concept over their alignment or creature type, as it would be in the Great Wheel or World Tree?

    • Absolutely. There are Archons in both Irian and Shavarath — but it’s a matter of taking that basic concept and applying it to the theme of the plane. Just as you can have devils spawned by Khyber in addition to rakshasa, you can have an angel born from Siberys in addition to the couatl. The creature type sets the mechanical ability and broad concept; the plane of original gives the CONTEXT and affects its goals, behavior, and cosmetic details.

      • The plane of origin of an immortal would essentially define its “culture”, like an elf is mechanically the same whether raised in House Phiarlan, Aerenal or in Valenar, correct?

        • Mechanically, yes. However, each immortal outsider is directly tied to their plane — so that “culture” is a fundamentally ingrained part of their being as opposed to learned behavior. This is back to the idea that immortals have limited free will; much of their initial identity is defined for them.

  2. One last question about Sakinnirot. In City of Stormreach, he’s described as having claimed dominion over other Overlords. Do you personally see this as just a delusion of grandure, with no real ability to back up his claim to dominance, or would you have seen him as having the equivalent of a higher divine rank other Overlords, perhaps the 3.5 equivalent of an intermediate (DR 11-15) or greater deity (DR 16-20)?

    • To a certain degree I think every Overlord claimed dominion over other Overlords, hence their fighting any time they bump into each other. But you could certainly give him a higher DR if you want it to be a more concrete thing.

    • Off topic comment:

      Now I can definitely see me altering the Tomb of Annihilation campaign in an Eberron setting, having Xen’drik instead of Chult, Lady Vol trying to make her Dragonmak active again with the death curse instead of Acererak, and the Atropal being, in reality, the fulfillment of the Prophecy which would release Sakinnirot.

      And yes, Lady Vol would be being played by the Lords of Dust 😉

      • Maybe something like this:

        “When the Thirteenth Moon bath the Eater of Souls
        In the Cradle of Fury, the Scar Which not Heal burns bright.
        The lost heir of the Mark of Death falls prey of its own goals,
        By the the Scions of Flame who wrongly do what is right.
        Two bounds broken spread like a plague ahead:
        A mindless hunger seeking to feast in every life,
        Cunning scheming reaching out to be in every thread.”

  3. How would you Imagine an Eberron Campaign themed around thwarting the LOD to play out, how would you start it off and what direction/ story elements would you introduce to make for an exciting long term campaign?

    • That’s a very big question. I’ve answered it as best as I can in the time available at the end of the post.

    • I think it depends on how you want to play it out. In one of my games, the players found a weapon in a mine where mabar was manifesting for IrrelivantReasons. At the time they were lowish level & a weapon that has a shadowy cloud dealing necrotic damage looks pretty impressive. That was before halloween.. now that it’s almost easter they may or may not have “rescued” a relatively helpful & nonthreatening LoD in disguise from demons, set out on a quest by what might have been either what he looked like (a giant), a powerful dragon, or perhaps a sovereign to get a dangerous artifact from the time of demons, and only recently during that quest started to realize that the original weapon pings as a demon slumbering but pleased with the course of events as long as the fact that it’s a demon remains unsaid when the paladin tried to divine sense a fey with no undead/fiend/etc around to detect. Long story short, there are two overlapping prophecies & different individuals want to ensure that events follow their preferred path. >:)

  4. The text is missing a link in the “Agents of Darkness” section.

    You mention that Overlords, rules-wise, would have divine rank, and are the most powerful beings on Eberron. Do this means that if they are released (or maybe even in its bound status), they can provide power to clerics, instead of only warlocks? If so, how would the concept of “faith” works when you work with an entity that actually have a physical presence? Actually, that second question might also apply to cleric of the Undying Court, and the cleric of the Lord of Blades.

    • Do this means that if they are released (or maybe even in its bound status), they can provide power to clerics, instead of only warlocks?
      Nope. The Overlords have powers equivalent to DR7, but per “Eternal Evil” (Dragon 337) they are “not deities… they cannot grant spells, though worshippers might gain power from Khyber itself.” I’ve clarified this in the article.

  5. Thanks again Keith! Thought Provoking (and character/adventure inspiring) as always.

    To what extent do things in Eberron suffer from depletion? There are, presumably, only so many rocks in the Ring that can fall and while this may be an arbitrarily large number is it possible schemes like scooping a hole in the Ring might weaken the influence/power of forces that descend from it like the Flame or arcane magic?

    Given the immortal nature of things like the Overlords and Couatls, I assume that their power is never really expended. A warlock draining power from one Overlord is not making them weaker forever, but does that power return to them when that Warlock dies? Or would methods like that be similar to breaking an Overlord’s vessel, weakening the influence of pieces?

    Was the kindling of the Flame something of a one-time event? Bel Shalor isn’t bound as tightly now as before. Would similar near-breakouts or a full breakout followed by a resealing produce a weaker seal? Or might it be a (horribly risky) but still contemplatable plan to release an Overlord with a nearly worn away seal so that you can attempt to reseal it with a firmer lock?

    Would an overlord with a broken vessel attempt to recoalesce upon being freed, or would you get a “reduced” overlord effect around each piece?

    If you did get a full breakout, would the Couatl also reappear or would the Flame remain in potentia to reseal them?

    Does shattering a vessel weaken the seal in any way or merely spread the area affected by the overlord? In 4E there was a line somewhere about some of the Overlords fraying their bonds. Is there any intermediate state between bound and free, with freedom requiring the Prophecy lock? Or was text like that referring to a spreading of influence?

    Thanks for reading and answering any of these!

    • Sure, depletion of the Ring of Siberys or any other sort of Dragonshard could be something you could explore.

      Looking at the kindling of the Flame, one thing to bear in mind is that the principle of the Flame is that it is strengthened by the souls of noble followers. So the couatl STARTED it — but it’s bigger than they are, and any depletion affects are offset by the devotion of its followers. But this is why that devotion MATTERS; the faith of those who follow the Flame helps to strengthen and maintain it.

      I’ve added a section about fraying of bonds and resealing. I’d say that there’s no absolute rule on the strength of a resealing; it will depend on the nature of the act that reforms the bond. The binding of Bel Shalor is a solid BINDING – but part of the idea is it used a physical manifestation of the Flame as his vessel, and that has had unforeseen consequences.

      A full breakout wouldn’t mean the return of couatl unless you mean a full breakout of ALL OVERLORDS EVERYWHERE. The Overlords aren’t individually bound by a few couatl; the Silver Flame is a field that touches all of Eberron (in a magical and metaphorical way — it touches spirits, not simply that it’s physically broadcast like a radio wave). I’d say that the destruction of the Flame and return of the couatl would be a way to release all Overlords, as opposed to the other way around. I don’t think the couatl could voluntarily undo their sacrifice, though they might be able to detach a few individual couatls in a limited way (not that the couatl who aided Tira Miron did so through spiritual channeling and visions, not by physcially assisting her). But if someone found a way to break up the Flame, that would have catastrophic effects.

  6. Oh my, oh my. As a DM, I’m on the verge on launching a whole “Call of Zuggtmoy” campaign, revolving around the spreading influence and possible return of an Overlord’s avatar. (As you may have guess from the title, I did a recasting, although not based on a “Does it originally have a godlike power?” approach as you mention in your post, but more: “May it work as an immortal embodiment of an ‘evil’ concept?”; in her case, rot and decay, and, elaborating from there, physical corruption, disease and such.)

    So, as inspiring as your posts tend to be generally speaking, this one seems of particular interest to me, and in the meantime… it’s very frustrating, because I know some of my players read the blog too, and that forces me to restrain myself and be careful about what I can say and the many questions I’d like to ask! I’ll stick to one, for now at least. It may overlap a bit with some of the ones from Max above.

    How do you put the balance between the actual releasing of an Overlord, which can only happen through the complex cogs of the Prophecy, in the one hand, and, in the other hand, her spreading influence through, for instance, “vessels” like Khyber crystals, or rakshasas encouraging comportments that “strengthen” her? Does “fraying their bonds” somehow facilitate the ways of the Prophecy, or is it entirely unrelated?

    Because “in my Eberron” –and while I don’t think this was ever canonically, explicitly stated, I don’t think either that I stray too far from what several hints here and there seem to indicate–, the increasing harvesting and near-industrial use of dragonshards over modern Khorvaire, Khyber shards included, for one, is bound to have some broad consequences… It’s not just on some rare sword or artifact anymore; it’s on every train, airship, and so on.

    • I’ve added a section on “The Fraying of Bonds” that addresses this. In my opinion this doesn’t entirely circumvent the Prophetic approach — remember that they’ve been at this for tens of thousands of years, and if it was easy they’d have already done it — but it is definitely a goal they can pursue that increases influence even if there’s no risk of absolute release.

      Most Overlords aren’t spread across enough crystals for the harvesting of dragonshards to have a significant effect, but it’s something we’ve specifically called out as an issue in Q’barra, where Masvirik IS spread across thousands of small shards and the greed of miners is going to spread his influence.

      • Thanks for the enlightening reply. The text about Q’barra was indeed the most prominent of the “hints” I mentioned (or so was I thinking), but I realize now my mistake lied in generalizing too much. Also, I guess I didn’t picture the Overlords so specifically and physically bound each to its own whale-sized individual monolith. I thought (fuzzily) that the presence of the Khyber shards, more or less as a whole, acted a bit like the material counterpart, maybe some sort of “anchor”, for the mystical force created by the sacrifice of the couatls. So harvesting the shards would bit by bit loosen the bonds, even if that wasn’t exactly at the place where the Overlord itself (or its… concentrated essence… or something) was kept.

        So now at least I know I’m wrong… even if for the occasion I think I’ll roll with the general authorization to bend things a bit to fit my own views and stories, because I’ll plead guilty to the charge of still digging the idea of a not-outward-apocalyptic but, nonetheless, sinister pervasive consequences of the late “magitech boom” that the continent get alongside the Last War. Not only does it provide a magical analogue for the nefarious effects of real-world industrialization and otherwise appreciable modern commodities, but it places the PC who would discover it before a conundrum: What can they do?? Good luck to convince the whole of Khorvaire to turn down the march of progress backwards, and renounce decades or more of innovations and improvements of everyday life, because ~perhaps~ they have a link with harshest winters in North Karrnath (are we sure it’s not rather the fault of those Fey?), political instabilities, or an alarming increase of aberrant dragonmarks, and some ancient demons of legends. (Aaaand I’m a sadistic DM, obviously.)

        • Also, I guess I didn’t picture the Overlords so specifically and physically bound each to its own whale-sized individual monolith.

          Every Overlord can be bound in its own way. The whale-sized Khyber shard is one option. But Bel Shalor, for example, is no longer bound to a physical vessel; he’s directly bound to the Silver Flame. The physical vessel is a tool you can use if it serves your campaign — but you can definitely posit a more abstract form of binding for an Overlord if that fits your needs. And if you want to say “All Eberron shards contribute to a field that reinforces the Silver Flame and industrial use of shards is destroying that”, go for it.

          • Is the Khyber shard binding at all related to elemental binding? Perhaps the Giants were studying the prison of a bound Overlord?

  7. Somewhat tangential, but what made you settle on an unknown number in the 30s for Overlords, rather than the classic 13-1 theme? Say, something like 12 fully bound, 1 partially free and resealed but influential (ie. Bel Shalor in this case)?

    • There’s lots of different reasons, from both a thematic and practical standpoint.

      Speaking practically: the sphere of influence of an Overlord is limited. They are spread across the world. If there’s only thirteen in total, that only leaves room for four or five in Khorvaire, which doesn’t give a lot of flexibility. As is, we wanted to leave room for individual DMs – or us – to add additional Overlords in the future.

      By contrast, the primary thirteens are planes, moons, and marks. Each are concretely defined; each covers a particular spectrum of concepts. If we took this approach with the Overlords, I’d want to consider their spheres more carefully and consider whether they are connected in some way to the Planes or Marks… and frankly, I don’t want the Overlords to be limited in that way.

      Beyond this, thematically, the planes and moons are tied to all of the Progenitors; the Overlords are purely tied to Khyber.

      So essentially, I like leaving the Overlords with more flexibility and less definition, and to leave room to add a new one if I want without shaking the foundation. We aren’t even bound to thirty; we’ve said “approximately thirty.”

  8. I feel that there are two kind of Overlords: the ones that involve “moral corruption” and the ones that involve physical threats like killing cold.
    Do you agree that the first one are more interesting for a campaign? How is an Overlord of cold campaign different from one involving the plain of cold? How is an overlord of cold different from an elemental? And if all it wants is freezing and killing, how does he shows his immense intelligence?

  9. How likely would having multiple members of the Lords of Dust band together to try to satisfy the preconditions for releasing all their individual Overlords in a single plot? Of course, assuming any of the prakhutus like Hektula, Mordakhesh, Durastoran, or Kashtarhak could stand to spend as much time as necessary in each other’s presence.

    My assumption would be a swift and bloody coup near the end for whoever could marshal enough support behind them. The fact that they need the Council of Ashtakala to adjudicate their disputes seems to say this is unlikely or rare in canon.

    • How likely would having multiple members of the Lords of Dust band together to try to satisfy the preconditions for releasing all their individual Overlords in a single plot?

      I don’t see a problem with it. The speakers pursue the interests of their Overlords. If you want them to work together, give their Overlords overlapping needs. If you want them to compete, give the Overlords conflicting requirements. You can assert that there are specific feuds that will drive the speakers to sabotage one another, but as a general rule it’s to their advantage to have more Overlords released as long as it doesn’t interfere with their own plans.

    • Dral Khatuur was part of a Frostfell backdrop article I wrote for Dungeon Magazine, but the article ended up being cut.

  10. One last small question for you Keith, Why do the various Rakshasa’s and fiends call themselves ‘The Lords of Dust’, do you you imagine this is paying homage to something or is it just an appropriately ominous sounding name?

    • I address this in the Demon Wastes article. The essentially idea is that they are the lords of a world that disappeared tens of thousand years ago. With the exception of a handful of locations, all that remains of the world is ash and rubble. Hence, they are the Lords of Dust… but that world could rise again.

    • I’m not sure if it’s something I can legally do. On the one hand, I was never paid for the article, so I believe I own the content. On the other hand, legally I’m not allowed to post actual concrete Eberron content; it’s WotC’s IP. Certainly, if WotC unlocks Eberron for the DM’s Guild, it’s something I could share.

  11. Incredible post, as usual. Now I really want Overlord-infused weapons/items in my stories.

    Could you give a couple more examples of those kind of items that you have already thought or used in campaigns?

  12. May i ask you how much is the undying court aware of the overlords? Are they actively fighting the lords of dust, even if they have issues with dragons too?

  13. Great article as always. The Overlords are a fascinating aspect of Eberron, and I wish there were more details about some of them – like the article on Rak Tulkhesh that appeared in the online Dragon Magazines a while ago.

    A few questions remain, though, as always:

    1) Are there any indications about who the Overlord imprisoned under the Krertok Peninsula in the Tashana Tundra is? His followers are bloodthirsty barbarians, so he seems to be a spirit of rage (but we have plenty of them, with Rak Tulkhesh, Ran Iishiv, and the Feral Heart), torture, mutilation, and cannibalism – or what else does he represent?

    2) Similarly, who is the spirit bound in Syrkarn? And here, a further question would be what his relation to the Yuan-ti is. I am confused about the chronology: were the Yuan-ti there before the Sundering? Are they a corrupted breed of Shulassakar? Are they creatures of the Overlord, or where they guardians until exposed and expelled by the Inspired?

    3) What do the various groups in Eberron know about this story? I assume the general populace of Khorvaire knows often warped mythology, but what about

    (a) scholars: do the sages of Arxanix know what rests underneath their island-towers? Does the Library of Korranberg have records on the Age of Demons? Has the Wayfinder organisation explored the Demon Wastes or other sites from that era?

    (b) spies: in particular, what do Phiarlan, Thuranni, and to a lesser extent, Medani know about this? They are supposed to protect against hidden dangers, but are they aware of the Lords of Dust – even if they cannot truly infiltrate them?

    (c) devotees: what has the Silver Flame pieced together? Does Dariznu, for instance, know that a shard of Rak Tulkhesh’s essence lies below Thaliost? Do the Carrion Tribes know what exactly they worship?

    4) One of the books (Explorer’s Handbook, I believe) mentions a heretic of the Silver Flame who posited that rakshasa could be redeemed. That is a theory that echoes some Christian beliefs that even Satan can be brought back to the side of good. I have a character who strongly supports this idea, even though the point is that she is utterly naive, but can this be exaggerated into the idea that eventually an Overlord or Khyber could be redeemed? Not asking whether this could happen, mind you, just whether such a belief could be developed, and perhaps how the usual actors would react to someone holding such an opinion.

    5) Rakshasa are, in most fantasy settings, portrayed as fairly decadent and hedonistic. Is there place for that – and for luxurious palaces, exotic slaves, and luscious gardens – in Eberron, if only for some of the breed?

    6) This question is more appropriate to its own lengthy article, but what is the history of humanity? We know, in its basics, about the Elves, whose ties to the fey spires were severed by Cul’sir. We know that the goblinoid races emerged from caves to build city states that became the Dhakaani Empire. We know that, at the height of the Dhakaani Empire, there were uncivilised Gnome tribes in the mountains, Orcs in the marshes, and lizardmen in the jungles. But when does humanity show up, and did they have some kind of early bronze age equivalent civilisations at the time of the Giant civilisations? Did they have trade with the Dhakaani?

    • There’s a lot of questions here and I have very little time. Here’s some very brief answers.

      1. It’s never been established in canon.

      2. The spirit is called “Syrkarn”(Sarlona p.16). The origins of the Yuan-ti are unclear, with conflicted reports as to whether they are corrupted Shulassakar, mutated humans, or something else. Likewise, they rose to rule the Syrkarn region during the Sundering, but were present in the shadows before that.

      3. I’ll address this in the main post when I have time.

      4. It’s not IMPOSSIBLE in principle; look at the kalashtar quori. There are immortal spirits that have evolved into other forms. However, consider how rare that is. Even the Kalashtar aren’t trying to redeem the quori or il-Lashtavar; they are essentially trying to nuke them. If it was a simple matter to transform an Overlord, there’s been tens of thousands of years for someone to pull it off. So sure, there’s people who believe in this, people who think it’s crazy and ignore it, and, I’m sure, a segment of the Pure Flame who believes this is a dangerous heresy spread by the Shadow in the Flame to trick deluded people into working with demons.

      5. Sure, if you want. Especially if you introduce an Overlord associated with sloth or gluttony. This sort of thing could also fit with the agents of Eldrantulku, following my whole image of decadent intrigues.

      6. This is definitely a subject for a different article, but you should refer to pages 13-14 of Secrets of Sarlona.

  14. What would buildings or ruins of Bel Shalor or even Durastoran look like and function?
    Specifically also, Bel shalors partial release in Thrane would have given plenty of chance to change some of the landscape or erect some kind of structure if he wanted. What kinds of remnants would there be of Bel shalors area back in the age of demons? During the war in Thrane?

  15. I don’t have a lot of thoughts on the Lords of Dust (the main topic of this post), but I do have thoughts on the creation myth (mentioned briefly at the start).

    I very much like that there are all kinds of different versions of the story of the Progenitor Wyrms in the various official books and supplemental materials; I assume this is likewise also the case in-world, as that suits an ancient myth that apparently transcends culture and religion quite nicely. It also very much begs the question of what the original version of the story was in-world, or if there even IS one original version… and, for that matter, of what truth, if any, underlies the myth.

    One twist I’ve conceived of for the creation myth, most suitable for a more atheistic take on the setting, is the idea that the myth had its origins as a metaphor dating back to the Age of Giants. Basically imagine if people forgot that the tale of the butterfly effect was meant to make a point about chaos theory. In this take on things, Siberys, Eberron, and Khyber were never really dragons or any other sort of individual creatures at all, but planes that collided with one another in the Astral Plane, forming the beginnings of the Material Plane. The “gravity” of this hybrid plane pulled other planes that were nearby at the time into orbit, resulting in the greater interconnected system that exists today. (If a different set of planes had happened to be nearby, Eberron’s cosmology, Material Plane included, would have ended up far, far more alien!) If this is the truth, then some version of the story close to the original might claim that the planes were not the creations of the progenitors at all, but “Dragons Aloft” in their own right…

    In this version of things, I imagine that Siberys’s “death” isn’t just why there are no good equivalents of Overlords and why some forms of magic are even a thing, but also why space is a vacuum and most celestial bodies can’t bear life. Any body in the Material Plane that CAN bear life is necessarily composed of an “Eberron” outer layer of mortal life and a “Khyber” core layer with associated Overlord manifestations — even if that takes a weird form like a water world with a mortal-inhabited near-surface and demon-infested blackwater depths. After all, those are the two “living” components of the Material Plane, and the plane’s very laws are such that they must occur together and struggle for dominance.

    • Definitely an interesting theory! And yes, it’s certainly the idea that there’s at least as many variations of the Progenitor myth as there are Deluge stories in our world…

  16. Every one of your articles are great inspiration for ideas for an Eberron Game. And try as I might, when I erect such great plans for a major over arcing storyline, it tends to crash as soon as it is introduced to the PCs. Best laid plans of mice and men.

    I use creative license to quickly rewrite my plans while allowing the PCs as much freedom as possible. So my main question, when you have built this great story and thrown out all of your hooks, how do you deal with PCs who refuse to follow the storyline? Do you allow the story to proceed and let the PCs know of the resulting effects due to inaction? How large of a stick do you fine effective?

    • This is an excellent question, but I think it’s a topic that should be addressed in its own article, as opposed to being a sub-question on a LoD post. My next article is going to cover another class analysis, but I’ll address this after that.

    • @Julius You might find the fate core rulebooks helpful for some guidance on spinning all the plates without too much railroading. My personal favorite is to not get too caught up in the details. start with an idea like “I want to explore the timeline so my grognard players with no eberron experience can learn the setting a little.” > “Making them fix a broken timeline seems like a good idea ” Yes there are certain events I want them to muck around with (elves/drow created by giants, giant empire, scaled apostate training the orcs, something in dhakaani, the lycanthropic purge, & the overlord escaping in thrane), but if they don’t do things I expect I can easily do stuff like introduce a completely fabricated giant culture ruling over humanoid slaves in whatever time period they are in things have frequently been introduced in unexpected & unanticipated ways. Since the end point is “and the timeline is restored” is vague enough, I can call it at any point. The fact that I’m almost certainly going to be using them to cause most of the horrible things & ensure they go horrbily as expected looks like I will be able to weave in a few prophecies of my own 😀

      It takes some practice, but it works very well once you get a gm style down that lets you do it

      • Thanks. I run FATE. That is why I try to give the players as much freedom as possible. Which may be the reason they break things.

  17. I wish I saw the part about adding other setting’s beings to the overlord mythos in Eberron before I started my Out of the Abyss campaign, it would save on homebrewing my game, because I decided to go with changing the enemy to Daekyr lords and that requires me to change up the plot quite a bit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *